Editorial Policy & Evidence Standards
Our policy prioritizes current packaging and seller terms for commerce, and independent medical authorities for health information.
Evidence hierarchy
For product-specific contents, the preferred order is a current physical label, current seller/checkout disclosures, and directly published support pages. For health evidence we prioritize NIH, NIDDK, NCCIH, FDA and appropriately designed peer-reviewed studies. Marketing content is always marked as seller-reported.
Research limitations
A study of a botanical extract does not establish the safety or effectiveness of Proto Flow as sold. We do not invent customer counts, personal testing, product ratings, physician endorsements or clinical reviews. If independent verification is missing, we say so.
Updating and correcting articles
Pages show a publication or review date. Commercial figures require rechecking before launch and after material seller changes. Editorial corrections should be supported by a primary source; when a material discrepancy is found, readers should see a dated note about the uncertainty.
Sources & verification
External sources support the points identified in the article; seller marketing is labeled separately from independent health evidence.